reconn is a PECB Authorized Titanium Partner

orbit by reconn.Quick answers on ISO 31000 and risk management

What is the difference between ISO 31000 and ISO 27001?

One is risk management guidance, the other is an information security management system you can be certified to.

  • By Shenoy
  • Updated

Every great mission starts with reconn.

ISO 31000 gives guidelines for managing any kind of risk, and an organization cannot be certified to it. ISO/IEC 27001 sets the requirements for an information security management system, and an organization can be certified to it. ISO/IEC 27005 links the two by applying risk guidance to information security.

ISO 31000 compared with ISO/IEC 27001
TopicISO 31000ISO/IEC 27001
What it isGuidelines for managing any kind of riskRequirements for an information security management system
CertifiableNo. ISO says it cannot be used for certificationYes. Organizations can be certified
EditionEdition 2, February 2018Edition 3, October 2022
Best forOne risk language across the organizationA certifiable information security program

How they fit together

ISO 31000 is the general method for thinking about risk: set the context, assess, treat, monitor and communicate. ISO/IEC 27001 is a management system for information security, and risk is a core input to it. ISO/IEC 27005:2022 supports the concepts in 27001 and adapts ISO 31000 guidance for information security risk, which is why it is the natural bridge.

Practitioner note: Teams sometimes ask which one to implement. They are not alternatives. If a customer wants a certificate for information security, that is ISO/IEC 27001. If you want one risk language across security, finance, operations and projects, that is ISO 31000. For the wider comparison, including COSO ERM and NIST, read the framework comparison.

Source